New Sticky Note

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

The draft is underway!

Click here to go to your war room, or visit the war room item in the draft menu.

League Forums

Main - General MFN Discussion

Re: Is anything going to be done about TE production?

By raymattison21
1/26/2017 12:50 pm
Kalispellian wrote:
Just a thought but maybe a fix is to let you pick a primary target from game to game; the QBs go to guy. Do it from game to game which would also allow game planning where an opponent has a weak CB2 or SLB and then increasing the chance of targeting the receiver or TE on that side by a few percentage points. Its Belichickian to gameplan to exploit a weak player on the opposing defense.


You can do alOT already but it's not as intuitive as one may like and kinda fake. Start out slow, and ask specific questions and someone will direct you.

TE s can rule an okay offense , but there 75 a logic that targets TES it's just set to a lower level....only cause owners can produce 100 catch seasons already.

Granted the code being tested in one has TEs being featured a bit more, due to QB reads. 1000 yards for TES is quite easy under both. But it will be easier in the near future

Re: Is anything going to be done about TE production?

By CamBowman53
2/03/2017 11:55 am
A lot of it has to do with gameplanning. Comb through your playbook and see what kind of pass plays you have selected. Target plays that either have TE or SE in the name of the play — which indicates the TE is the #1 read.

I recently took over a team that had a 99/99 TE on the roster, so I selected at least 5-6 pass plays that were specific to him. After 6 seasons, his previous career highs for any given season were 46/542/2. My first season with my playbook, he went 56/809/8. With a couple more adjustments this off-season, I hope he will break 60/1,000/10 next season.

It takes some thought and work, but once you have a good gameplan set, it makes a world of difference.