Setting dead cap to zero sounds nice and all, to me it also sounds like another way to manipulate the system for those looking to do so.
Seems like way too much work though. Who's gonna build a team with one account, then switch to another account every time they come close with the cap? Just doesn't seem feasible to me.
Setting dead cap to zero sounds nice and all, to me it also sounds like another way to manipulate the system for those looking to do so.
Seems like way too much work though. Who's gonna build a team with one account, then switch to another account every time they come close with the cap? Just doesn't seem feasible to me.
Seems the solution is, not to involve the admin, but for the owners to reject poor trade offers. Is it one owner's fault if another accepts a trade that is imbalanced? Seems like a lot of whining about an owner who manages his team in a way that other owners don't approve of. As long as trades don't violate code of conduct policy and the two owners involved are willing trade partners, then what business is it of other owners? By all means, warn other owners of "bad" trade partners, but don't go trying to get the owner drummed out of the league by the admin.
