would one rather draft an OL with 60 str and 80 rblk/pblk? OR 90 strebth and 60 r/p blk?
....and now you have your answer :) As above, I too hav found lower str, higher blk ol to be very serviceable. Also, the OL, well... if one wants an O that can move - have time to pass, open up the gaps, I encourage to have a decent one;) It was actually the first place I addressed when I started MFN, DBs being second. That was 4.3 though.... These days, its o/d lines, TE's RBs and LBs, as everything tends to happen between the line of scrimmage - 5-10yds.
MFN really, really needs to fix the catch rating.... The most important fix for the off for 4.6, in my very humble opinion.