The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

The draft is underway!

Click here to go to your war room, or visit the war room item in the draft menu.

League Forums

Main - General MFN Discussion

Re: Player Stats- Player position

By parsh
3/13/2015 6:40 pm
I am curious is a player led the league in something, does it effect a future contract

Re: Player Stats- Player position

By jsid
3/13/2015 6:49 pm
WarEagle wrote:
If a user on here wanted to run their team as you are suggesting, they would (or could) be doing it now.

I just don't see what difference it would make to show the leaders, or have awards.


They could, I agree. However, there's not much incentive to right now. If there are awards for it the incentive to do such becomes higher. Teams like that didn't exist like that in GLB until HoF came out.

Re: Player Stats- Player position

By mrfakename
3/13/2015 9:28 pm
Losing is the incentive. Having more incentive to win might be the way to go. Pro Bowls and league awards would be an awesome addition. Also, having awards adjust the contracts of players would reflect the NFL some what.

Re: Player Stats- Player position

By Davesgang
3/14/2015 1:04 am
It happens to some extent in the nfl.
Denny Green head coach of the Vikings was quoted as saying something like... it was more important to sell tickets than win. He thought the way to do that was flashy star focused offense and weak turnover focused defense.

Re: Player Stats- Player position

By WarEagle
3/14/2015 8:28 am
jsid wrote:
WarEagle wrote:
If a user on here wanted to run their team as you are suggesting, they would (or could) be doing it now.

I just don't see what difference it would make to show the leaders, or have awards.


They could, I agree. However, there's not much incentive to right now. If there are awards for it the incentive to do such becomes higher. Teams like that didn't exist like that in GLB until HoF came out.


In my opinion, a simple acknowledgement is a much smaller incentive than getting a top 5 pick, or even a slightly better draft position, so I don't think it would have a negative impact at all.