this exactly what my mindset is I need two main positions this offseason a SLB and RB to replace Buck the SLB im staring at is likely going way before the pick and the RBs are all risk i hate picking high volatile players and therfore i decided to trade the pick for a player i can use at both WR and RB and still get quite postive runs from him the 1st rounder obviously was going to be apart of the trade to help clear more cap and because of his trade value giving up more would have to happen in order to make it. I refused to trade other players because of how thin most positions were for me. i chose the LT because he was not only a backup but easily replaceable the 2nd rounder is almost 3 years away which will have little impact for me at that time with all the other picks i have for 1985 thats why the deal is where it was. I wish trades that are declined could be viewed by the league because some offers i receive are so lopsided and yet i take these types of trades and get ridiculed about my own thought process. setherick i understand where your coming at no ill will at all but i dont make blind trades like i did in earlier seasons.

He will lose SP. The math on SP is ~1 SP / 7# of body weight. It's not exact and sometimes a player with gain/lose 4 SP moving 21-22 pounds. But they will definite lose (or gain) SP because of weight.

But I don't understand this argument when you let this guy walk in FA who could have been as productive as the guy you traded for will be: https://paydirt.myfootballnow.com/player/6175

i thought i had already resigned him tbh that was a mistake on my fault

there has been several leagues im in where i have made this mistake real life has been busy

you can see under my transactions i attempted to sign him back if you want proof but at that time i was $24 Mill in the Red and he chose you

Trade is Rejected 2-1-0

Accept: 1
Reject: 2
Abstain: 0

Assets will be returned to their teams and this will not count towards the Trade Restriction.
Both GM's can rework the deal and resubmit.

From a learning experience, can we get the reasoning for it being rejected? I agree, I thought it was an overpay, but it wasn't a grossly negligent deal and both owners seemed happy with what they were losing and receiving

Feels like we need a stronger majority vote in order to veto a trade. Just my opinion

Maybe 5 person committee? To be honest this was a tough decision and can see both sides.