2. Miami Dolphins, 8 picks, right behind jouamengs Panthers!, MVRowner took over the team in the 86 season, Seanito had them for 86, and 5005 had them the previous 5 seasons. They did not make the playoffs in the past 5 seasons, and are currently 3-6. Would be interesting to see which team(s) got the Miami players for in exchange for those picks, from a relatively new owner, less than one years experience. That will be next post on this thread. Point being, a team can be hurt more by giving up good players for first round picks, especially 1.20 on down.
Hmmm, it seems the Dolphins have been "raped" since MVRowner has taken over the team with little experience/knowledge of the game. Didnt take long for the sharks to go after this bleeding body in the water. Rules or no rules! lol
In order.........
1. Washington Redskins sends:
Robin Kelley (WR) Kelly is now back with Dolphins, apparently trade was reversed?
Miami Dolphins sends:
Anthony Jackson (C)
1991 Round 2 (Miami Dolphins)
2. Carolina Panthers sends:
1990 Round 3 Selection 29
1990 Round 6 Selection 27
1991 Round 6
1992 Round 3
Miami Dolphins sends:
Charles Broadnax (WR)
1992 Round 7 (Miami Dolphins) Note: There were a lot of comments and concern on this one. Broadnax is currently WR3 and FB4. for the Panthers.
3.
Cleveland Browns sends:
Corey Cortez (WLB)
Chad Kreger (WR)
1989 Round 1 Selection 31
Miami Dolphins sends:
1989 Round 1 Selection 1 (Miami Dolphins)
there goes a high first rounder! for a bottom 1st, a 10 yr LB, and a WR with 74 speed. Shame on you Salty! Enjoy the comments about this trade! LOL I can say that MVRowner was not at fault here, other than having a lack of game knowledge and experience, he's a good kid in college, so does not have 3 hours or more to waste on this game every day, lol.
4. Houston Texans sends:
1989 Round 1 Selection 2
Miami Dolphins sends:
1989 Round 1 Selection 10 (New Orleans Saints)
1990 Round 1 (Miami Dolphins)
1991 Round 1 (Miami Dolphins)
WOW! Texans/Salty was like a serial rapist on the two trades with Miami, lol. Brutal. So, can see why the major sensitivity to a team trading its first rounders, however, it still comes down to whether or not the 1st round pick is receiving good value, which was not the case here. This type of trade is what I was referring to when I made my explanation in the trade with the Saints, and why the rule that I was not aware of at the time, was implemented but apparently not enforced from what I can see, tell me if Im wrong and show me a reversed trade due to that rule other than my most recent one with the Saints/ricmoney.
Anyway, the topic is draft analysis, and it diverged to trade review, so back to the original subject and question of interest. Why did only one team with five 1.1 to 1.10 picks consistently win and contend for the LC? and why did only one team out of 6 with 3 picks do the same?, Next ..... lets look at the picks!