GG GDad

Heckuva game azy/Steelers, we had to scratch and claw just to get back in it, I dont remember ever seeing as many times where a pass rusher was on top of a QB and still got a good completion. Also so many times you had 2 and 3 defenders on top of the targeted receiver. We got the final break to win it, I wanted to kill the coach for calling a pass in FG range and not killing the clock. We may get the "rubber match" this season.

GG Giants

GG Ravens, I’m pleasantly surprised about getting the victory. I’m sure we’re gonna have one more game against each other in the playoffs so you’ll probably get your win back.

Gg Gdad. Not sure about the rubber match, I’m just hoping to finish above .500 at this point. This may be a lost season at this point.

The Browns just eked by you in that game, you're only one game back of a WC spot, you get 5 wins or more out of the 8 games left and voila! I would bet on that. The two games vs the Ravens will be a factor.

GG Lions

hmm. Setherick left the league.

Unrelated, I get this weird feeling there's many accounts just doing data drives. Prolly shadow accounts (dupes) if so.
There are GMs that are just clearly picking the same bad plays when better plays with better results are being used and then removed from their playbooks. It's like some teams - having tried plays that DO work - and the games played data shows that such plays have been used and did work for said team, are refusing to use plays that produced positive results while choosing to use plays that create negative results (under 3 yards gained and over 5 yards allowed).
Either it's data mining or it's tanking.
I can't be the only player seeing teams that are choosing the lowest denominator of their playbooks while that team history shows that team has removed plays used that worked to favor plays that do not.

If it's data mining - it's dupes.
If it's not about data, it's about dumping wins and TANKING.

That stated, it seems as though the same gms that continue to choose plays that do not work over the plays that do, do so year after year. WHich makes me think its data mining and not tanking. But if its data mining and multiple teams continue to remove plays that work in favor of using plays that don't, it cant be tanking. But clearly teams that remove plays that work in favor of plays that do not must be tanking.
Tanking or taking data through multiple accounts?
Multiple accounts or tanking...
Multiple accounts tanking?

I'ma throw that out there like Trump: It's true because it's plausible. There's no evidence other than incompetence. INcompetence is not implausible, and there for it could be true because it's possible.

There very nearly was a threat so attack is the option.

Just helping to make America great again - where the truth is only a possibility and the idea of the negative outcome being potentially possible is the absolute equity of all justifications regarding the actual improbabilities as defined by facts; and because of such possibilities, the very likelihood of bad actors rigging the system against all of us.

Because something is possible, everything becomes plausible.
that's some serious double thinking for an Unsub like me.

There very likely might be a possible threat, so the obvious choice is to attack.
Seems all f'd up when it's about MFN but apparently makes perfect sense for US diplomacy.

Well now, that escalated quickly.

So, what the F does so called American diplomacy have to do with MFN and playbooks and data?

Proving bad plays are still bad plays or choosing bad plays to get bad results?
Using bad plays and getting bad results is not proof of either concept, especially when it happens from the same people season after season.

The wheels on the bus go round and round.
It seems we have many GMs across many teams doing both. It's widespread throughout all leagues.

The bottom line is i see things that make me ponder if there are bad actors. That does not mean there are actual bad actors. It certainly does not justify me attacking any other player i think *might be* playing with poor intentions. But hey I did. I didn't name names, I just dropped bombs.
I certainly did not give any evidence for data miners and team tanking beyond broad correlation and baseless assumptions.

When correlation becomes cause is when the truth becomes meaningless.
What's good for America, must certainly be good for me.

Assumptions are never assertations, but both require putting one's a s s on the line first.

Making MFN Great Again and dropping bombs like it's december 2001.

GG Texans!!!

GG Jags