People who liked this post
Spoilers

  • Paydirt Footba...
    • League Home
    • Power Rankings
    • Hall of Champions
  • League Forums
  • Players
    • Search
    • Draft History
    • Trades
  • Coaches
    • Search

  • Community
  • Log In
League Rules Debate 1970
League News/General Discussion
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • ›
Beercloud
League Rules Debate 1970
by Beercloud @ 7/20/2017 3:48 pm
Debate Rules Proposals here
Liked by Pernbronze
Beercloud
Re: League Rules Debate 1970
by Beercloud @ 7/20/2017 5:24 pm
Teams that finish below .500 (7 wins) in the last season they cannot trade away their 1st round pick.

Teams that finish with 5 wins or less cannot trade away their 1st or 2nd round picks.


I see both pros and cons to this one.

Discuss
jouameng
Re: League Rules Debate 1970
by jouameng @ 7/20/2017 5:38 pm
I'd argue that teams below .500 would be allowed to with the condition that the competition committee be unanimous in the decision to approve the trade. I feel like this way no team that is struggling is kept from improving their team while it also allows the trading of the first and second round picks to be held in check.
Liked by Pernbronze
chinaski
Re: League Rules Debate 1970
by chinaski @ 7/20/2017 5:43 pm
Im personally against most rules on trading. Leaving it up to the competition committee to veto the horribly lopsided trades and call it good.
Liked by Campton, Pernbronze, WarEagle
Warthog
Re: League Rules Debate 1970
by Warthog @ 7/20/2017 5:51 pm
Completely disagree with this proposal. Let the free market decide trades. There is no reason to restrict bad teams from trading any pick/player. It could all be part of a longer term strategy to build their team. I am against this proposal.
Liked by Pernbronze, WarEagle, chinaski
coltsfan75
Re: League Rules Debate 1970
by coltsfan75 @ 7/20/2017 6:24 pm
I am also against this idea. Keep the trading rules the same for everyone at all times.
Liked by Pernbronze, WarEagle, Kuder51
WarEagle
Re: League Rules Debate 1970
by WarEagle @ 7/20/2017 10:40 pm
Against this idea for many reasons, one of which is that often a team that has a poor season needs more than just one top prospect in order to turn the team around.

A trade will often serve them better if they are smart about it.
Liked by Pernbronze
Pernbronze
Re: League Rules Debate 1970
by Pernbronze @ 7/21/2017 2:56 am
WarEagle wrote:
Against this idea for many reasons, one of which is that often a team that has a poor season needs more than just one top prospect in order to turn the team around.

A trade will often serve them better if they are smart about it.


Agreed plus in a draft you can often get stuck where the only good players are positions you are already strong in, while having many other holes.
Liked by WarEagle
Dorichm
Re: League Rules Debate 1970
by Dorichm @ 7/21/2017 10:00 am
I am against this rule. It would really hamper a rebuilding effort in the future that teams will undoubtedly have to engage in. A high first round pick can easily turn into three early round picks which can jump start the effort.
Liked by Pernbronze, WarEagle, r3g4nj4k3
blackflys
Re: League Rules Debate 1970
by blackflys @ 7/21/2017 2:32 pm
As long as a trade makes sense for both teams and the owners from both teams clearly are managing their team then they should be able to trade. If they aren't that active or it doesent make much sense for one of the teams and is a unfair trade then don't hesitate to veto

just the cape ability of being able to veto it will hopefully stop any **** trades and if it doesent then the commish will.
Liked by Campton, jgcruz, Pernbronzeand 2 others
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • ›
Copyright ©2013-2026 Catalyst Productions | Weather data powered by Visual Crossing
Game Engine Version 4.6 | Website Version 5790fa3
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy