All GM's can vote. One team one vote rule. Voting ends Aug 8, 12:01am est
Proposal 2: Hiring and Firing of GM's
1) GM's could get fired for under-performing , a winless season or for league conduct violations. 2) Once fired they would go to the back of the waiting list. 3) No more than 3 GM's can be fired in a given season. And at least one if there is someone on the waiting list. 4) New GM's can't be fired in their first 3 seasons unless they have 2 winless seasons in that time frame.
There are several ways to determine when a GM can be fired. . A) If they have a winless season. B) If they have 3 consecutive seasons with less than 5 wins C) If they have 4 consecutive seasons with less than 7 wins D) If they have 5 consecutive seasons under .500 E) If they have 6 consecutive seasons not making the playoffs F) If a GM takes over a playoff team and miss the playoffs for 3 consecutive seasons. G) 3 League Conduct violations. H) No GM can be fired in their first 3 seasons with exception of rule 4. I) If no one is on the waiting list each GM will retain their tenure with exception of rule G. J) Once a GM is fired from their team they may not be hired by that same team for 3 seasons. They may be hired by another team at any time, determined by the waiting list.
Yes: 9
No: 5
Teams voting record Denver Oakland Kansas City X San Diego X New England Jets Miami X Buffalo Pittsburgh Cincinnati Baltimore Cleveland X Indianapolis X Tennessee X Jacksonville X Houston Dallas Washington Philadelphia X Giants Arizona Los Angeles X San Francisco X Seattle Chicago Detroit X Green Bay X Minnesota X Carolina Atlanta New Orleans Tampa Bay X
Its hard enough to get 30 people active and interested in a league, I think adding strict performance rules only hampers that. If we had a waiting list 10 deep all the time, then maybe, I guess it would be ok. I can see people being scared off from the league if their time and effort building a team could be wasted if their grand scheme for success ends of sucking and they get the boot. Ive never seen these rules work in FOF and I don't see it happening here.
Re: Rule Voting: Proposal 2
by
setherick
@
8/01/2017 8:32 am
Yes. - It may need reevaluated, but in theory it looks good.
Re: Rule Voting: Proposal 2
by
Kuder51
@
8/01/2017 10:03 am
I agree with chinaski. Just need to get a list of people before we fire someone. Just my thought.
Re: Rule Voting: Proposal 2
by
Campton
@
8/01/2017 10:11 am
setherick wrote:
Yes. - It may need reevaluated, but in theory it looks good.
I agree. But i have the feeling this leagues going to get popular. Not many has put as much time and effort into this as he has. Maybe softer rules but i do like them