The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - League News/General Discussion

Re: Cast votes for whether you're for or against New Award: Rookie GM

By jgcruz
11/21/2017 12:43 pm
UPDATE:

Voting closes 11/23/17 @ midnight est

Re: Cast votes for whether you're for or against New Award: Rookie GM

By Salty_Watermelon
11/23/2017 12:29 pm
For

Re: Cast votes for whether you're for or against New Award: Rookie GM

By Wolveraider
11/23/2017 12:49 pm
Voting for.

Warthog wrote:
In principle, I am willing to go along with this. But in reality, how many new GMs is there going to be each year vying for this award, 1? 2? At least I hope it is a small number. So is an award really needed when so few are actually eligible?


That said....sure would be a bummer if you were the only new GM and didn't win the award.

Re: Cast votes for whether you're for or against New Award: Rookie GM

By raymattison21
11/23/2017 2:30 pm
For.

To enlarge the number of possible applications a set criteria that would allow for more chances to compete for the award thus allowing more chances for applicants .

For example, havin at least 16 regular season games under thier belt but not over 32 while only allowing one chance to win that award.

Still, with only one new user a season would make you a lock. I also like the idea of eight to 24 games for a qualification .

While taking three seasons to turn around a team.....especially a bad one definitely is not unheard of and could possibly deserve recognition .

Taking all this into mind would no doubt deepen the pot to choose from.
Last edited at 11/23/2017 5:04 pm

Re: Cast votes for whether you're for or against New Award: Rookie GM

By Gustoon
11/23/2017 4:22 pm
4

Re: Cast votes for whether you're for or against New Award: Rookie GM

By botastiac
11/24/2017 1:06 am
for

Re: Cast votes for whether you're for or against New Award: Rookie GM

By Beercloud
11/24/2017 10:14 am
Poll Closed

Passed