jouameng wrote:
Yeah... No. I feel like the league already agreed that we'd let trades go however unless it was clearly unbalanced or collusion. I don't think this trade should've been rejected simply because you can argue that it's unfair. The trade Washington made with NYG could be argued as unfair. The trade Atlanta made with the Chargers could equally be as unfair. This is one you needed to let go through.
I hope my post wasn't miscontrued. I had no problem with the trade per se.
My issue was whether Houston was competing to win based on the make up of its roster and its lack of players, especially DBs. I see that Houston's roster now has 52 players - albeit it's stocked with some pretty old players (a chance to see if long term experience really matters - as in playbook knowledge).
Nevertheless, I appreciate Houston's effort to be competitive. I recognize that GMs have different styles and ways to approach building and running team. All anyone ask is that GMs try to WIN each game utilizing all the tools at their disposal - including managing a "full" roster and all that entails, as well as game planning
Anyway, GL to both Houston and Tennessee going forward.