New Sticky Note

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - League News/General Discussion

Re: Completed Trade: Carolina Panthers and Seattle Seahawks

By Mcarovil
6/11/2019 12:11 pm
Not that my opinion matters, but both owners have been around long enough to weigh the pros and cons of a trade and I would suggest a little more latitude when long time active owners agree to a trade.

Re: Completed Trade: Carolina Panthers and Seattle Seahawks

By greyghost1225
6/11/2019 12:49 pm
Mcarovil wrote:
Not that my opinion matters, but both owners have been around long enough to weigh the pros and cons of a trade and I would suggest a little more latitude when long time active owners agree to a trade.


So what you are saying is there should be different trade rules for owners base on their tenure? So we should set a system that let's say for owners that have played 0-3 months, 3-6 months, etc.?

Re: Completed Trade: Carolina Panthers and Seattle Seahawks

By 50051139
6/11/2019 12:50 pm
greyghost1225 wrote:
Mcarovil wrote:
Not that my opinion matters, but both owners have been around long enough to weigh the pros and cons of a trade and I would suggest a little more latitude when long time active owners agree to a trade.


So what you are saying is there should be different trade rules for owners base on their tenure? So we should set a system that let's say for owners that have played 0-3 months, 3-6 months, etc.?


im with greyghost you start doing that it will cause an imbalance

Re: Completed Trade: Carolina Panthers and Seattle Seahawks

By Mcarovil
6/11/2019 1:18 pm
What trade rule did this violate? I didn't think there was a violation, just that it was considered imbalanced?

Re: Completed Trade: Carolina Panthers and Seattle Seahawks

By 50051139
6/11/2019 1:22 pm
Mcarovil wrote:
What trade rule did this violate? I didn't think there was a violation, just that it was considered imbalanced?


doesnt look like it was a rule but definitely way to much for a corner in his 8th year when supposedly they begin regressing in their 9th year

Re: Completed Trade: Carolina Panthers and Seattle Seahawks

By 50051139
6/11/2019 1:26 pm
50051139 wrote:
Mcarovil wrote:
What trade rule did this violate? I didn't think there was a violation, just that it was considered imbalanced?


doesnt look like it was a rule but definitely way to much for a corner in his 8th year when supposedly they begin regressing in their 9th year


plus that would give him 5 picks in 1981 in the first round and 4 picks in 1980 in the first round i thought you could only have 3 ?

Re: Completed Trade: Carolina Panthers and Seattle Seahawks

By Mcarovil
6/11/2019 1:28 pm
I agree with you but, again, its about two guys that have been here long enough to understand the impact to both their teams. Seattle is trying to win now. Are 2 late first round picks worth a championship? Either way, it doesn't impact me, but if it doesnt violate a trade rule, owners histories should be considered.
50051139 wrote:
Mcarovil wrote:
What trade rule did this violate? I didn't think there was a violation, just that it was considered imbalanced?


doesnt look like it was a rule but definitely way to much for a corner in his 8th year when supposedly they begin regressing in their 9th year

Re: Completed Trade: Carolina Panthers and Seattle Seahawks

By Beercloud
6/11/2019 1:40 pm
awest827 wrote:
Lol it took us 11 trade offers to get the price down to this.
[/quote]

[quote]LMAO. Jouameng is a legend.


These bout made me spit out my drink. Priceless.

Everybody's opinions matter. Absolutely.

Explanation:.
There were no rules broken. My vote was because of imbalance only. I know both GM's are vets and top notch. But when I place my vote I take the trade face value. I dont care how many first rounders any team has accumulated s long as they have at least 1 in the next 3 yrs per that rule. Unless there was a rule against having a certain amount of first rounders. But that is another discussion. So wether Im right or wrong that is how I do it.

Re: Completed Trade: Carolina Panthers and Seattle Seahawks

By greyghost1225
6/11/2019 1:56 pm
The part of the trade 2 #1's for a very good CB, it was a little overpaid, not alot, but #1 and #2 would have been a more fair deal. In regards to rest of throwing in a decent LB and a #4 for a #7, not even close, when the first part of the deal is already uneven. I think both owners are great owners and operate from a fair standpoint. The are both experienced, but that doesn't mean mistakes are not made. I normally take a view of the league overall, just my nature, but my competitive nature also is involved and if the NFC wants to just create a couple super teams and leave the rest of their conference in the dust, more power to them.

Re: Completed Trade: Carolina Panthers and Seattle Seahawks

By Mcarovil
6/11/2019 2:11 pm
Carolina is going to have to wheel and deal to keep the salary cap from playing a role in using those 1st and 2nd round picks. Should be entertaining but they are very good at it.