New Sticky Note

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

The draft is underway!

Click here to go to your war room, or visit the war room item in the draft menu.

League Forums

Main - General MFN Discussion

Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!

By punisher
7/12/2018 11:11 am
-----------------------
Last edited at 7/22/2018 3:59 pm

Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!

By punisher
7/16/2018 11:44 am
------------------
Last edited at 7/22/2018 3:59 pm

Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!

By punisher
7/18/2018 1:09 pm
---------------
Last edited at 7/22/2018 3:59 pm

Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!

By punisher
7/19/2018 8:56 am
-----------------
Last edited at 7/22/2018 4:00 pm

Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!

By punisher
7/21/2018 9:43 pm
-------------------
Last edited at 7/22/2018 4:00 pm

Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!

By Mr.Krazy
7/22/2018 3:08 pm
Punisher, could you please announce league openings in the league matchmaking forums and stop spamming this forum with leagues that are going into the 0.4.3 engine?

Thanks

Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!

By punisher
7/22/2018 4:02 pm
Let me first off i really thought i was doing a service here to tell about each league that was going into the new version

and probably i should have posted it in the league matchmaking instead of here so to everyone i am sorry


here is where i will post from now on = https://mfn19.myfootballnow.com/community/2/4725?page=1#29041

Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!

By setherick
7/23/2018 11:15 am
Need clarification on this.

* Bump and run coverage has been improved where the DB will now run with the WR and interrupt the pattern


Is this accurate? In testing, at least before April 1, it was M2M that allowed DBs to run with WRs and interrupt patterns. When did this change?

This explains why so many long routes are suddenly open all of the time since most DBs have crappy B&R and fall down as soon as they are beat. ...

If this description is correct, then M2M is a worthless attribute since B&R will now control downfield coverage and short coverage and getting beat off the snap and ... you get it. Dumb.

---

If you're saying that failed B&R will now cause the DB to turn and run with the WR, then it's just false because that does not appear to be happening at all.
Last edited at 7/23/2018 11:21 am

Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!

By jgcruz
7/23/2018 11:25 am
setherick wrote:
Need clarification on this.

* Bump and run coverage has been improved where the DB will now run with the WR and interrupt the pattern


Is this accurate? In testing, at least before April 1, it was M2M that allowed DBs to run with WRs and interrupt patterns. When did this change?

This explains why so many long routes are suddenly open all of the time since most DBs have crappy B&R and fall down as soon as they are beat. ...

If this description is correct, then M2M is a worthless attribute since B&R will now control downfield coverage and short coverage and getting beat off the snap and ... you get it. Dumb.

---

If you're saying that failed B&R will now cause the DB to turn and run with the WR, then it's just false because that does not appear to be happening at all.


Is there any way to dictate or anticipate when DBs will use B&R?

Re: Announcing Version 0.4.3!

By setherick
7/23/2018 11:32 am
jgcruz wrote:
setherick wrote:
Need clarification on this.

* Bump and run coverage has been improved where the DB will now run with the WR and interrupt the pattern


Is this accurate? In testing, at least before April 1, it was M2M that allowed DBs to run with WRs and interrupt patterns. When did this change?

This explains why so many long routes are suddenly open all of the time since most DBs have crappy B&R and fall down as soon as they are beat. ...

If this description is correct, then M2M is a worthless attribute since B&R will now control downfield coverage and short coverage and getting beat off the snap and ... you get it. Dumb.

---

If you're saying that failed B&R will now cause the DB to turn and run with the WR, then it's just false because that does not appear to be happening at all.


Is there any way to dictate or anticipate when DBs will use B&R?


No. I'm complaining about that in a separate thread: https://mfn1.myfootballnow.com/forums/6/1444?page=1&x=nOkHGdGMd3#9982