People who liked this post
Spoilers

  • Paydirt Footba...
    • League Home
    • Power Rankings
    • Hall of Champions
  • League Forums
  • Players
    • Search
    • Draft History
    • Trades
  • Coaches
    • Search

  • Community
  • Log In
GG Thread 1991
League News/General Discussion
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • ...
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • ›
Wolveraider
Re: GG Thread 1991
by Wolveraider @ 11/20/2021 6:59 am
Good game MM/Chiefs!
Liked by Meatmen
trslick
Re: GG Thread 1991
by trslick @ 11/20/2021 9:58 am
GG Ravens
CrazyRazor
Re: GG Thread 1991
by CrazyRazor @ 11/20/2021 2:55 pm
GG New Orleans/Mcarovil
Liked by Meatmen
slowtospeak
Re: GG Thread 1991
by slowtospeak @ 11/20/2021 3:27 pm
GG Colts
Liked by Meatmen
GrandadB
Re: GG Thread 1991
by GrandadB @ 11/21/2021 3:33 pm
Well, still long way to go and , you know, one small mistake and the season and the fun will end.....forever..... because imo 4.6 is killing the fun .... but could be better in other ways.....

Well, you've already done the 3 peat, and now have what I would consider a 90% shot at the fourth in a row. Your first game against WFT was the only close call, the other 10 games this season have been blow outs. The only mistake that might happen would be if you missed doing the game prep in the playoffs. 4.6 only "kills the fun" if you dont like tighter, more competitive games, without getting a couple of FL Hitch TDs every game off using the play 10 times or more. Personally, I like 4.6, not that its any closer to RL, but its a change from the repetitive advantages and "samo samo" that 4.5 presented. The "formula" (play selection and use) for 4.5 does not work in 4.6, so unless "fun" is blowing other teams out by using several plays for 90% of the time with a strong group of WRs & RBs that can score off those plays, and a defense that is loaded with 80+ elite level players using 2-3 plays 90% of the time, then I can understand why 4.6 wouldnt be considered "fun". Am not criticizing doing that, its necessary if you're going to compete for the LC. For me, football strategy and figuring out what works best both in plays and player attributes is the "fun" of the game. But, I understand reluctance to change, especially when you have something that is working real well for you.
Last edited 11/22/2021 5:17 am
Liked by Meatmen
Infinity on Trial
Re: GG Thread 1991
by Infinity on Trial @ 11/21/2021 6:28 pm
Good game, SD. My team is so bad on both sides of the ball, I don't know which side to try to "fix" first.
Liked by Meatmen
jgcruz
Re: GG Thread 1991
by jgcruz @ 11/21/2021 8:18 pm
Infinity on Trial wrote:
Good game, SD. My team is so bad on both sides of the ball, I don't know which side to try to "fix" first.

GG, Rams.

You do have a solid game plan, IMO. GL the rest of the way.
Last edited 11/22/2021 1:19 am
Liked by Meatmen
trslick
Re: GG Thread 1991
by trslick @ 11/23/2021 9:43 am
GG Colts
Liked by Meatmen
GrandadB
Re: GG Thread 1991
by GrandadB @ 11/23/2021 2:21 pm
GG Packers, close till the 4th qtr, then Mullens connected on the long *****, that wont be happening in 4.6.

Last edited 11/23/2021 7:41 pm
Liked by Meatmen
mwd65
Re: GG Thread 1991
by mwd65 @ 11/23/2021 4:17 pm
Good *** woopin', CR! We were turrible!
Liked by Meatmen
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • ...
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • ›
Copyright ©2013-2026 Catalyst Productions | Weather data powered by Visual Crossing
Game Engine Version 4.6 | Website Version 5790fa3
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy