Re: Rule Porposals
by
marinarul10
@
7/04/2020 11:59 am
setherick wrote: I want to propose limiting DEs to the DE position and at least 276#. The reason why is the ridiculous sack stats I'm racking up with WLBs as DEs. I totally agree with that ..... P.S. Wondering if you will use this in the upcoming POs? ....
|
Re: Rule Porposals
by
jgcruz
@
7/04/2020 12:00 pm
setherick wrote: I want to propose limiting DEs to the DE position and at least 276#. The reason why is the ridiculous sack stats I'm racking up with WLBs as DEs. This is open for discussion. If sethrick can get a second, the proposal will be considered during the offseason.
|
Re: Rule Porposals
by
setherick
@
7/04/2020 12:04 pm
marinarul10 wrote: setherick wrote: I want to propose limiting DEs to the DE position and at least 276#. The reason why is the ridiculous sack stats I'm racking up with WLBs as DEs. I totally agree with that ..... P.S. Wondering if you will use this in the upcoming POs? .... I'm not sure. I've reproduced it everywhere, so it feels like cheating. I will need to decide which of my LBs to make DEs.
|
Re: Rule Porposals
by
jouameng
@
7/04/2020 12:20 pm
Proposing the disabling of the Trade Meter as well as opening the HoF nomination to all GM's.
|
Re: Rule Porposals
by
jgcruz
@
7/04/2020 12:43 pm
jouameng wrote: Proposing the disabling of the Trade Meter as well as opening the HoF nomination to all GM's. Looks like two different proposals. Open for discussion, and if seconded will be voted on during the offseason.
|
Re: Rule Porposals
by
setherick
@
7/04/2020 1:03 pm
marinarul10 wrote: setherick wrote: I want to propose limiting DEs to the DE position and at least 276#. The reason why is the ridiculous sack stats I'm racking up with WLBs as DEs. I totally agree with that ..... P.S. Wondering if you will use this in the upcoming POs? .... Is this an official seconded?
|
Re: Rule Porposals
by
CrazyRazor
@
7/04/2020 1:18 pm
I officially second both proposals.
|
Re: Rule Porposals
by
marinarul10
@
7/04/2020 2:15 pm
|
Re: Rule Porposals
by
jgcruz
@
7/04/2020 8:41 pm
Please be specific about what you are seconding (thirding). Thanks.
|
Re: Rule Porposals
by
CrazyRazor
@
7/04/2020 9:47 pm
jgcruz wrote: Please be specific about what you are seconding (thirding). Thanks. Are you serious?!! Smdh I 2nd the proposal of limiting DE's to the DE position & atleast 276#'s. I 2nd the proposal of disabling the Trade Meter as well as opening HoF nomination to all GM's.
|