People who liked this post
Spoilers

  • Paydirt Footba...
    • League Home
    • Power Rankings
    • Hall of Champions
  • League Forums
  • Players
    • Search
    • Draft History
    • Trades
  • Coaches
    • Search

  • Community
  • Log In
Rule Porposals
League News/General Discussion
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • ...
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • ›
Androwski
Re: Rule Porposals
by Androwski @ 5/07/2020 2:08 pm
I want to vote yes but I don't agree with the "immediate removal from the league" part. What if the IA puts a WR to rush the punt because of an injury? I think giving at least 1 warning before banning the GM should be added to the rule.
Liked by Meatmen, Black Adder
jgcruz
Re: Rule Porposals
by jgcruz @ 5/07/2020 4:10 pm
Androwski wrote:
I want to vote yes but I don't agree with the "immediate removal from the league" part. What if the IA puts a WR to rush the punt because of an injury? I think giving at least 1 warning before banning the GM should be added to the rule.

Removing a GM still requires a vote of the other GMs as to whether to remove the offending GM. If the offending GM convinces the other GMs that he didn't intentionally break the rule, he won't be removed.
Liked by CrazyRazor, Androwski, Meatmen
Androwski
Re: Rule Porposals
by Androwski @ 5/07/2020 5:07 pm
jgcruz wrote:
Androwski wrote:
I want to vote yes but I don't agree with the "immediate removal from the league" part. What if the IA puts a WR to rush the punt because of an injury? I think giving at least 1 warning before banning the GM should be added to the rule.

Removing a GM still requires a vote of the other GMs as to whether to remove the offending GM. If the offending GM convinces the other GMs that he didn't intentionally break the rule, he won't be removed.
Ok. I still think this might lead to some unfair situations but I trust the rest of the GM's to understand when something wasn't intentional. I'll vote yes.
jgcruz
Re: Rule Porposals
by jgcruz @ 5/07/2020 5:30 pm
Androwski wrote:
jgcruz wrote:
Androwski wrote:
I want to vote yes but I don't agree with the "immediate removal from the league" part. What if the IA puts a WR to rush the punt because of an injury? I think giving at least 1 warning before banning the GM should be added to the rule.

Removing a GM still requires a vote of the other GMs as to whether to remove the offending GM. If the offending GM convinces the other GMs that he didn't intentionally break the rule, he won't be removed.

Ok. I still think this might lead to some unfair situations but I trust the rest of the GM's to understand when something wasn't intentional. I'll vote yes.

I understand your concern. I don't expect it to come up often. Thanks.
Mcarovil
Re: Rule Porposals
by Mcarovil @ 5/07/2020 5:32 pm
Where is the poll? I can’t find it.
Liked by Warthog
Meatmen
Re: Rule Porposals
by Meatmen @ 5/07/2020 6:00 pm
IDK if there isn't going to be a governing structure...why bother? Are we, Do we have rep,? or football operations"
CrazyRazor
Re: Rule Porposals
by CrazyRazor @ 5/07/2020 8:40 pm
Mcarovil wrote:
Where is the poll? I can’t find it.

Polls are Titled : Position Rules & Position Limits
Liked by Mcarovil
Black Adder
Re: Rule Porposals
by Black Adder @ 5/08/2020 2:07 pm
Where is the poll ,I can`t find it .
Liked by Mcarovil
Androwski
Re: Rule Porposals
by Androwski @ 5/08/2020 2:10 pm
1st poll: https://paydirt.myfootballnow.com/forums/1/1330?page=0#

and 2nd poll: https://paydirt.myfootballnow.com/forums/1/1329?page=0#
setherick
Re: Rule Porposals
by setherick @ 7/04/2020 10:53 am
I want to propose limiting DEs to the DE position and at least 276#. The reason why is the ridiculous sack stats I'm racking up with WLBs as DEs.
  • ‹
  • 1
  • 2
  • ...
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • ›
Copyright ©2013-2026 Catalyst Productions | Weather data powered by Visual Crossing
Game Engine Version 4.6 | Website Version 5790fa3
Terms & Conditions | Privacy Policy