I want to vote yes but I don't agree with the "immediate removal from the league" part. What if the IA puts a WR to rush the punt because of an injury? I think giving at least 1 warning before banning the GM should be added to the rule.
I want to vote yes but I don't agree with the "immediate removal from the league" part. What if the IA puts a WR to rush the punt because of an injury? I think giving at least 1 warning before banning the GM should be added to the rule.
Removing a GM still requires a vote of the other GMs as to whether to remove the offending GM. If the offending GM convinces the other GMs that he didn't intentionally break the rule, he won't be removed.
I want to vote yes but I don't agree with the "immediate removal from the league" part. What if the IA puts a WR to rush the punt because of an injury? I think giving at least 1 warning before banning the GM should be added to the rule.
Removing a GM still requires a vote of the other GMs as to whether to remove the offending GM. If the offending GM convinces the other GMs that he didn't intentionally break the rule, he won't be removed.
Ok. I still think this might lead to some unfair situations but I trust the rest of the GM's to understand when something wasn't intentional. I'll vote yes.
Re: Rule Porposals
by
jgcruz
@
5/07/2020 5:30 pm
Androwski wrote:
jgcruz wrote:
Androwski wrote:
I want to vote yes but I don't agree with the "immediate removal from the league" part. What if the IA puts a WR to rush the punt because of an injury? I think giving at least 1 warning before banning the GM should be added to the rule.
Removing a GM still requires a vote of the other GMs as to whether to remove the offending GM. If the offending GM convinces the other GMs that he didn't intentionally break the rule, he won't be removed.
Ok. I still think this might lead to some unfair situations but I trust the rest of the GM's to understand when something wasn't intentional. I'll vote yes.
I understand your concern. I don't expect it to come up often. Thanks.