I guess I just think differently the trade looks way lopsided to me. looks like Miami is taking all the financial risk for an older player they may or may not be able to resign and an average Shmo with less than average stats. The star of this side in the 1st round #3 VS. two players with high potential and 4-5 years left for short money and 2 #1 picks a 24th and an unknown...
looks lopsided to me....I did not ask for this review. I did vote to reject it.
Now as far as collusion among the competition committee I have to object. I hate to see someone get beat...like I did when I started until I understood how the game worked. I have seen players get beat by the best of them....Gm's who's jock strap your not fit to wear...I have had run ins with all of them. they all say the same thing what/ I can't build my team.......Personally, I don't care what you do or how you play your game. Knock yourself out dude...I am on the competition committer and part of that is to rule on trades. I vote my concience and your right my style or mindset IS different so yes I disagree with some of your tactics ..but don't accuse anyone of colluding without proof. Now that you have stomped your feet and made fun of the grown ups..go rework an even trade that the current CC will approve.
I don't have any bad feelings towards you...I actually PM'd mitch today and I think I spoke pretty highly of you....Good luck in your future trades sir........................................MM