Unfortunately those days are over. Now you need a legit QB and that gets you 250 yds. Maybe.
greyghost1225 wrote:
50051139 wrote:
Mcarovil wrote:
MFN 24/7. Kids and wife don’t get in my way. Seriously though. 4 would be a good compromise but if 5 so be it. I’ll be ok. Coach norm and I can haggle over 60 rated FBs. All in good fun!!
meanwhile ill attempt to turn a 57 rated WR into a 75 if i stare hard enough by day 5 i think it will be at a 58 lol
good thing to do, I won 14 games one season with a 68 QB
I will let you know on that one. I think that I had one qb hit that since 4.4 was released.
FA is too long. How much time do you want to look at 100 year old players?
Some people do have a personal life, not me. I just go to school and work.
School work i write novels and i still think 5 weeks is too long
Accountant 3 sons playing baseball, one college baseball treasurer for townball baseball one football player one soccer player 2 hockey players and I still think 5 weeks is too long, but really I don't care much. I agree with most that 4 is probably best.
Ok Married. 2 kids. 6 and 3. US GOV employee assigned to a foreign country responsible for all related agency activities. CPA also. 5 weeks FA is too long.
DJSim22 wrote:
50051139 wrote:
greyghost1225 wrote:
Gustoon wrote:
FA is too long. How much time do you want to look at 100 year old players?
Some people do have a personal life, not me. I just go to school and work.
School work i write novels and i still think 5 weeks is too long
Accountant 3 sons playing baseball, one college baseball treasurer for townball baseball one football player one soccer player 2 hockey players and I still think 5 weeks is too long, but really I don't care much. I agree with most that 4 is probably best.
i wanted to bring up something i just thought about when were talking about hall of famers stats are we considering post season stats separate from regular season stats or will they be combined because if they are combined might want to reconsider the amount of stats needed for each category and if they are not combined should their be a separate eligibility for playoff stats the "Julian Edelman debate"
I think if a guy only produces in the playoffs he really isn't Hall of Fame worthy. Good memories but just not Hall worthy. He needs to produce for an entire career. And vice versa, not being successful in the playoffs shouldnt be a deciding factor either aka Jim Kelly / Dan Marino. That's more of a debate for who is and who isn't the GOAT imo.
