The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - League News/General Discussion

Re: Rules Debate

By greyghost1225
2/18/2019 7:16 pm
jouameng wrote:
In my opinion 3 days is just too short of time in my mind to comb through free agency and sign players. With the league as competitive as it is, Free Agency plays a huge part of teams putting a team together that they feel can compete. Yes, I understand that the free agency pool has looked dreadful these past years, but there are always players that are talented enough for multiple teams to bid on. Having it set to 3 days would limit the amount of time allowed by teams to find a back up option if they miss out on their primary targets(Especially when there are players out there that can't make up their mind. Even when you're the only offer on the table.) I even noticed that this year's 1st day of free agency ran on a Saturday night, a night that usually all of MFN has off and it would've left those owners that were unaware with only 2 days left of free agency to fill voids on their roster. That's the primary reason that I voted No to changing FA to 3 days. If it were bumped up to 4 of Free Agency though, I think it'd be long enough to give teams time to go through their targets and also short enough where it didn't necessarily feel like an eternity. A nice compromise to those who can't wait for the draft and those who prefer filling out their teams through FA... and of course giving Beercloud time to work on stuff behind the scenes.


I agree it is too short. There are 6-8 teams right now that have a hard time keeping up with the pace, adding a quicker pace will be a bigger hindrance to those franchises.
Last edited at 2/18/2019 7:20 pm

Re: Rules Debate

By Gustoon
2/19/2019 4:05 pm
FA is too long. How much time do you want to look at 100 year old players?

Re: Rules Debate

By greyghost1225
2/19/2019 4:46 pm
Gustoon wrote:
FA is too long. How much time do you want to look at 100 year old players?


Some people do have a personal life, not me. I just go to school and work.

Re: Rules Debate

By 50051139
2/19/2019 7:06 pm
greyghost1225 wrote:
Gustoon wrote:
FA is too long. How much time do you want to look at 100 year old players?


Some people do have a personal life, not me. I just go to school and work.


School
work
i write novels
and i still think 5 weeks is too long

Re: Rules Debate

By greyghost1225
2/19/2019 7:45 pm
50051139 wrote:
greyghost1225 wrote:
Gustoon wrote:
FA is too long. How much time do you want to look at 100 year old players?


Some people do have a personal life, not me. I just go to school and work.


School
work
i write novels
and i still think 5 weeks is too long


I get it, fortunately my son is raised, not married, pretty much on my own. I don't have anyone else to be conscious of. For example this week I had an interview for a different position, went to an art show, having a tooth pulled, going to a concert, have a meeting with my adviser, worked, finished 2 papers and had a test, so it can be done. I don't have to spend anytime with the wife, kids, or any other family though. I have already agreed that 5 weeks is a bit long, I would vote for 4. Anything less is too short, my top leagues are the ones with a 4 day free agency. This is obviously #1, so I will tolerate more. :)
Last edited at 2/19/2019 7:48 pm

Re: Rules Debate

By Mcarovil
2/19/2019 7:54 pm
MFN 24/7. Kids and wife don’t get in my way. Seriously though. 4 would be a good compromise but if 5 so be it. I’ll be ok. Coach norm and I can haggle over 60 rated FBs. All in good fun!!

Re: Rules Debate

By greyghost1225
2/19/2019 7:57 pm
Mcarovil wrote:
MFN 24/7. Kids and wife don’t get in my way. Seriously though. 4 would be a good compromise but if 5 so be it. I’ll be ok. Coach norm and I can haggle over 60 rated FBs. All in good fun!!


Lol, you need to take a serious look at your priorities. :)

added note: Just so you know I am also a certified Life Coach, if you ever need to talk pm me and I will send you my phone #.
Last edited at 2/19/2019 7:58 pm

Re: Rules Debate

By 50051139
2/19/2019 7:58 pm
Mcarovil wrote:
MFN 24/7. Kids and wife don’t get in my way. Seriously though. 4 would be a good compromise but if 5 so be it. I’ll be ok. Coach norm and I can haggle over 60 rated FBs. All in good fun!!


meanwhile ill attempt to turn a 57 rated WR into a 75 if i stare hard enough by day 5 i think it will be at a 58 lol

Re: Rules Debate

By greyghost1225
2/19/2019 8:01 pm
50051139 wrote:
Mcarovil wrote:
MFN 24/7. Kids and wife don’t get in my way. Seriously though. 4 would be a good compromise but if 5 so be it. I’ll be ok. Coach norm and I can haggle over 60 rated FBs. All in good fun!!


meanwhile ill attempt to turn a 57 rated WR into a 75 if i stare hard enough by day 5 i think it will be at a 58 lol


good thing to do, I won 14 games one season with a 68 QB

Re: Rules Debate

By Mcarovil
2/19/2019 8:13 pm
Unfortunately those days are over. Now you need a legit QB and that gets you 250 yds. Maybe.
greyghost1225 wrote:
50051139 wrote:
Mcarovil wrote:
MFN 24/7. Kids and wife don’t get in my way. Seriously though. 4 would be a good compromise but if 5 so be it. I’ll be ok. Coach norm and I can haggle over 60 rated FBs. All in good fun!!


meanwhile ill attempt to turn a 57 rated WR into a 75 if i stare hard enough by day 5 i think it will be at a 58 lol


good thing to do, I won 14 games one season with a 68 QB