New Sticky Note

The new user interface is in preview!

Want to check it out? Click here! (If you don't like it, you can still switch back)

League Forums

Main - League News/General Discussion

Re: Rule Porposals

By Androwski
5/07/2020 1:08 pm
I want to vote yes but I don't agree with the "immediate removal from the league" part. What if the IA puts a WR to rush the punt because of an injury? I think giving at least 1 warning before banning the GM should be added to the rule.

Re: Rule Porposals

By jgcruz
5/07/2020 3:10 pm
Androwski wrote:
I want to vote yes but I don't agree with the "immediate removal from the league" part. What if the IA puts a WR to rush the punt because of an injury? I think giving at least 1 warning before banning the GM should be added to the rule.


Removing a GM still requires a vote of the other GMs as to whether to remove the offending GM. If the offending GM convinces the other GMs that he didn't intentionally break the rule, he won't be removed.

Re: Rule Porposals

By Androwski
5/07/2020 4:07 pm
jgcruz wrote:
Androwski wrote:
I want to vote yes but I don't agree with the "immediate removal from the league" part. What if the IA puts a WR to rush the punt because of an injury? I think giving at least 1 warning before banning the GM should be added to the rule.


Removing a GM still requires a vote of the other GMs as to whether to remove the offending GM. If the offending GM convinces the other GMs that he didn't intentionally break the rule, he won't be removed.

Ok. I still think this might lead to some unfair situations but I trust the rest of the GM's to understand when something wasn't intentional. I'll vote yes.

Re: Rule Porposals

By jgcruz
5/07/2020 4:30 pm
Androwski wrote:
jgcruz wrote:
Androwski wrote:
I want to vote yes but I don't agree with the "immediate removal from the league" part. What if the IA puts a WR to rush the punt because of an injury? I think giving at least 1 warning before banning the GM should be added to the rule.


Removing a GM still requires a vote of the other GMs as to whether to remove the offending GM. If the offending GM convinces the other GMs that he didn't intentionally break the rule, he won't be removed.


Ok. I still think this might lead to some unfair situations but I trust the rest of the GM's to understand when something wasn't intentional. I'll vote yes.


I understand your concern. I don't expect it to come up often. Thanks.

Re: Rule Porposals

By Mcarovil
5/07/2020 4:32 pm
Where is the poll? I can’t find it.

Re: Rule Porposals

By Meatmen
5/07/2020 5:00 pm
IDK if there isn't going to be a governing structure...why bother? Are we, Do we have rep,? or football operations"

Re: Rule Porposals

By CrazyRazor
5/07/2020 7:40 pm
Mcarovil wrote:
Where is the poll? I can’t find it.


Polls are Titled : Position Rules & Position Limits

Re: Rule Porposals

By Black Adder
5/08/2020 1:07 pm
Where is the poll ,I can`t find it .

Re: Rule Porposals

By Androwski
5/08/2020 1:10 pm
1st poll: https://paydirt.myfootballnow.com/forums/1/1330?page=0#

and 2nd poll: https://paydirt.myfootballnow.com/forums/1/1329?page=0#

Re: Rule Porposals

By setherick
7/04/2020 9:53 am
I want to propose limiting DEs to the DE position and at least 276#. The reason why is the ridiculous sack stats I'm racking up with WLBs as DEs.